Public Relations and Media Unit
I discussed a master’s thesis in the College of Education for Human Sciences - University of Basra ((The US policy towards Argentina 1939-1974))
The message of the researcher (Hamid Abdel Ghaffar Hamid) included frameworks that show the importance of the political relations of the United States and Argentina and their impact on the most important bilateral, regional and international issues.
The thesis was divided into an introduction, four chapters, a conclusion and appendices, which formed within its general framework the subject of the study. The first chapter came under the title (The discovery of Argentina and the development of bilateral relations between it and the United States of America, 1516-1938), while the second chapter was under the title (The position of the United States of America towards Argentina 19-1939). The liberation revolution and its impact on the breakthrough in American-Argentine relations (1955-1966), as for the fourth and final chapter of the message was (The strategy of the United States in dealing with political and economic developments in Argentina-1974).
Perhaps the most prominent finding of the study is that the policy pursued by the United States of America towards Argentina during the period (1939-1974) had one goal and a second goal, which is to make Argentina, which is one of the most influential Latin American countries in the Western Hemisphere, revolve in the orbit of its policy. The foreign ministry to be supportive and supportive of its decisions at the regional and international levels, especially during the cold war period. This policy that was confronted by the governments that followed the rule of Argentina during the above period is fundamentally different from what the United States wanted Argentina to play. The policy of Argentina was dominated by the strategic framework to achieve the priorities set by the Argentine governments in the context of achieving the interests of their country above all else. Duplicity in dealing with the United States of America was the accurate description of it, so we see it supporting it sometimes and rejecting it at other times. But in general, and in its final outcome, it did not go beyond the will of the United States of America, because the governments were fully convinced that they desperately needed the support and assistance of the United States at the military and economic levels. Militarily, those governments needed American weapons and military equipment to prove their strength regionally and internationally. American financial support to face those economic crises that afflict it and that are caused by political differences due to the general policies that are unique to those governments and are running according to them.
